Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

murmansk.ru

Арктический обозреватель - Мурманск

Page Load Speed

4.1 sec in total

First Response

482 ms

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

516 ms

About Website

Visit murmansk.ru now to see the best up-to-date Murmansk content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about murmansk.ru

Информационные и аналитические материалы о жизни в Арктике и в районах Крайнего Севера – Мурманской и Архангельской областях, республиках Карелия и Коми, в Ненецком автономном округе.

Visit murmansk.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Murmansk.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 482 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

murmansk.ru performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

92/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

18/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.2 s

43/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value430 ms

65/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.363

0/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.8 s

35/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

murmansk.ru

482 ms

murmansk.ru

589 ms

main.css

131 ms

main.js

528 ms

hit

514 ms

Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Murmansk.ru, 7% (2 requests) were made to Counter.yadro.ru and 7% (2 requests) were made to Mc.yandex.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Murmansk.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 41.0 kB (6%)

Content Size

675.6 kB

After Optimization

634.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Murmansk.ru main page is 675.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 549.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 31.6 kB

  • Original 36.5 kB
  • After minification 27.8 kB
  • After compression 4.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.7 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.6 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 9.3 kB

  • Original 549.9 kB
  • After minification 540.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Murmansk images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 85.4 kB
  • After minification 85.4 kB
  • After compression 85.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 20 B

  • Original 3.8 kB
  • After minification 3.8 kB
  • After compression 3.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Murmansk.ru has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

21

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Murmansk. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

murmansk.ru accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

High

<object> elements do not have alternate text

Best Practices

murmansk.ru best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

murmansk.ru SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Murmansk.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Murmansk.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Murmansk. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: