Access mylifesite.net. myLifeSite I CCRC Research and Senior Living Options

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

94/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.1 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.9 s

64/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value600 ms

50/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.173

69/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.1 s

33/100

10%

mylifesite.net

119 ms

mylifesite.net

286 ms

cookieblocker.min.css

55 ms

2fe52b03b76aae427a7f963cbb1c2866.min.css

228 ms

hooks.min.js

160 ms

Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Mylifesite.net, 3% (1 request) were made to Js.hs-scripts.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (540 ms) belongs to the original domain Mylifesite.net.

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Mylifesite.net main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 115.9 kB

Original 140.2 kB
After minification 136.9 kB
After compression 24.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 115.9 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 253.3 kB

Original 2.0 MB
After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, MyLifeSite needs image optimization as it can save up to 253.3 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 7.2 kB

Original 257.6 kB
After minification 257.6 kB
After compression 250.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

Original 106.5 kB
After minification 106.5 kB
After compression 105.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mylifesite.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of MyLifeSite. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.