Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 33

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 18% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 73

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

mylive.com

** MYLIVE.COM powered by Dr. Stefanus Hadi Science Center (SHSC), since 1999 **

Page Load Speed

559 ms in total

First Response

38 ms

Resources Loaded

339 ms

Page Rendered

182 ms

About Website

Welcome to mylive.com homepage info - get ready to check MYLIVE best content right away, or after learning these important things about mylive.com

Mylive, lifestyle, live, tv, video, digital, mobile, wireless, cell phone, local, satellite, maps, stefanus, hadi, Science, Center, shsc

Visit mylive.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Mylive.com page load time and found that the first response time was 38 ms and then it took 521 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mylive.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

mylive.com

38 ms

stefanushadi.blog

28 ms

twentysixteen.css

77 ms

86 ms

80 ms

Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Mylive.com, 46% (13 requests) were made to S2.wp.com and 14% (4 requests) were made to S0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (156 ms) relates to the external source Staticpage.files.wordpress.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.6 kB (1%)

Content Size

119.7 kB

After Optimization

118.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Mylive.com main page is 119.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 86.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-46%

Potential reduce by 301 B

  • Original 652 B
  • After minification 652 B
  • After compression 351 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 301 B or 46% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 86.2 kB
  • After minification 86.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. MYLIVE images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 26.7 kB
  • After minification 26.7 kB
  • After compression 25.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 148 B

  • Original 6.1 kB
  • After minification 6.1 kB
  • After compression 5.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mylive.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (59%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

9

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of MYLIVE. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

mylive.com accessibility score

33

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

mylive.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

mylive.com SEO score

73

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mylive.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Mylive.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of MYLIVE. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: