Access mywalletjoy.com. Quicken Compare

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

92/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

24/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.1 s

93/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value200 ms

90/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.014

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.1 s

63/100

10%

www.quickencompare.com

92 ms

JyZsPScrbDonJztqLmFzeW5jPXRydWU7ai5zcmM9CgknaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xldGFnbWFuYWdlci5jb20vZ3RtLmpzP2lkPScraStkbDtmLnBhcmVudE5vZGUuaW5zZXJ0QmVmb3JlKGosZik7Cgl9KSh3aW5kb3csZG9jdW1lbnQsJ3NjcmlwdCcsJ2RhdGFMYXllcicsJ0dUTS1QSjU5MlZRJyk7

12 ms

javascript;base64,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

12 ms

autoptimize_d3ddd73ce59cfd1a0ab8534ad0ea4f36.css

38 ms

autoptimize_single_0425db51f3bc91a057acf8b5c3bc3847.js

52 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Mywalletjoy.com, 14% (5 requests) were made to and 6% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (466 ms) relates to the external source Quickencompare.com.

Content Size

331.1 kB

After Optimization

257.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Mywalletjoy.com main page is 331.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 226.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 71.2 kB

Original 86.0 kB
After minification 85.6 kB
After compression 14.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 71.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

Original 226.4 kB
After minification 226.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mywalletjoy images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 657 B

Original 8.5 kB
After minification 8.5 kB
After compression 7.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 1.9 kB

Original 10.2 kB
After minification 10.2 kB
After compression 8.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mywalletjoy.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.9 kB or 19% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mywalletjoy. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.