Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

stylelink.matrix.com

Hair Styling: Hairspray, Mousse, Pomade & More | Matrix

Page Load Speed

674 ms in total

First Response

27 ms

Resources Loaded

567 ms

Page Rendered

80 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Stylelink Matrix content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about stylelink.matrix.com

Achieve any look you desire with our styling products. From hair volume powders to hairspray and gels, Matrix offers everything you need for a flawless look.

Visit stylelink.matrix.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Stylelink.matrix.com page load time and found that the first response time was 27 ms and then it took 647 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

stylelink.matrix.com performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.0 s

32/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,650 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.041

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.2 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

stylelink.matrix.com

27 ms

styling

136 ms

matrix-bundle.css

35 ms

jquery-3.4.1.min.js

25 ms

jquery.unobtrusive-ajax.min.js

131 ms

Our browser made a total of 15 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 7% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Stylelink.matrix.com, 93% (14 requests) were made to Matrix.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (136 ms) relates to the external source Matrix.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 454.1 kB (44%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

587.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Stylelink.matrix.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 486.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 256.0 kB

  • Original 298.5 kB
  • After minification 298.3 kB
  • After compression 42.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 256.0 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 12.8 kB
  • After minification 12.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stylelink Matrix images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 123.1 kB

  • Original 486.1 kB
  • After minification 486.1 kB
  • After compression 363.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 123.1 kB or 25% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 75.0 kB

  • Original 244.2 kB
  • After minification 244.2 kB
  • After compression 169.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stylelink.matrix.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 75.0 kB or 31% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (60%)

Requests Now

10

After Optimization

4

The browser has sent 10 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stylelink Matrix. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

stylelink.matrix.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

stylelink.matrix.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

stylelink.matrix.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stylelink.matrix.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stylelink.matrix.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Stylelink Matrix. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: