Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 88

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    90% of other websites

  • 60

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

naamsieraad.com

Page Load Speed

753 ms in total

First Response

127 ms

Resources Loaded

563 ms

Page Rendered

63 ms

About Website

Visit naamsieraad.com now to see the best up-to-date Naamsieraad content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about naamsieraad.com

Expired Registration Recovery Policy

Visit naamsieraad.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Naamsieraad.com page load time and found that the first response time was 127 ms and then it took 626 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

naamsieraad.com performance score

88

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

76/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

81/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.2 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value210 ms

89/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.4 s

83/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

naamsieraad.com

127 ms

index.php

18 ms

screen.css

16 ms

style_eRRP.css

29 ms

jquery.min.js

8 ms

Our browser made a total of 18 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Naamsieraad.com, 11% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 6% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (305 ms) relates to the external source Parkingcrew.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 55.9 kB (43%)

Content Size

130.9 kB

After Optimization

74.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Naamsieraad.com main page is 130.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 90.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 4.9 kB

  • Original 6.8 kB
  • After minification 5.2 kB
  • After compression 1.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.5 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.9 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-44%

Potential reduce by 13.0 kB

  • Original 29.8 kB
  • After minification 16.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Naamsieraad needs image optimization as it can save up to 13.0 kB or 44% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 35.3 kB

  • Original 90.9 kB
  • After minification 89.4 kB
  • After compression 55.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 35.3 kB or 39% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

  • Original 3.5 kB
  • After minification 2.1 kB
  • After compression 815 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Naamsieraad.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.7 kB or 77% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

14

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 14 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Naamsieraad. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

naamsieraad.com accessibility score

60

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

naamsieraad.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

naamsieraad.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Naamsieraad.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Naamsieraad.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Naamsieraad. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: