Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

namow.org

Provide Nutritious Meals to Seniors | North Area Meals on Wheels Syracuse NY

Page Load Speed

7.7 sec in total

First Response

161 ms

Resources Loaded

5.8 sec

Page Rendered

1.7 sec

About Website

Welcome to namow.org homepage info - get ready to check Namow best content right away, or after learning these important things about namow.org

North Area Meals on Wheels (NAMOW) helps seniors and the disabled stay in their own homes and maintain their independence.

Visit namow.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Namow.org page load time and found that the first response time was 161 ms and then it took 7.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

namow.org performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

38/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value35.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.2 s

13/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,920 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.161

73/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.2 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

namow.org

161 ms

namow.org

927 ms

sbi-styles.min.css

105 ms

style.min.css

159 ms

styles.css

161 ms

Our browser made a total of 268 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (221 requests) were addressed to the original Namow.org, 7% (19 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (8 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) relates to the external source Jnn-pa.googleapis.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (11%)

Content Size

11.8 MB

After Optimization

10.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Namow.org main page is 11.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 10.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-94%

Potential reduce by 573.0 kB

  • Original 611.4 kB
  • After minification 608.2 kB
  • After compression 38.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 573.0 kB or 94% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 375.3 kB

  • Original 10.0 MB
  • After minification 9.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Namow images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 331.6 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB
  • After compression 694.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 331.6 kB or 32% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 7.8 kB

  • Original 199.7 kB
  • After minification 199.2 kB
  • After compression 192.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Namow.org has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 67 (27%)

Requests Now

244

After Optimization

177

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 244 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Namow. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 45 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

namow.org accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

namow.org best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

namow.org SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Namow.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Namow.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Namow. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: