Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 7

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    22% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

nearest.place

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

694 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

659 ms

About Website

Welcome to nearest.place homepage info - get ready to check Nearest best content for Germany right away, or after learning these important things about nearest.place

Nearest! is a mapping software to build state-of-the-art store locator or location finder for points of interest, dynamic objects or events.

Visit nearest.place

Key Findings

We analyzed Nearest.place page load time and found that the first response time was 694 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

nearest.place performance score

7

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

43/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.2 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value13,880 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.57

12/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value27.2 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

nearest.place

694 ms

modal.css

94 ms

template.css

185 ms

mootools-core.js

459 ms

core.js

188 ms

Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Nearest.place, 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Trello-attachments.s3.amazonaws.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (694 ms) belongs to the original domain Nearest.place.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 499.1 kB (19%)

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Nearest.place main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 13.5 kB

  • Original 19.1 kB
  • After minification 18.0 kB
  • After compression 5.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.5 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 34.4 kB

  • Original 2.0 MB
  • After minification 1.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Nearest images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 337.4 kB

  • Original 504.4 kB
  • After minification 498.2 kB
  • After compression 166.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 337.4 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 113.7 kB

  • Original 136.5 kB
  • After minification 130.4 kB
  • After compression 22.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nearest.place needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 113.7 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (47%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

16

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nearest. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

nearest.place accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

nearest.place best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

nearest.place SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nearest.place can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Nearest.place main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Nearest. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: