Access neobird.de. Cross-Platform Software Development - NeoBird

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

28/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value23.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.5 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,180 ms

21/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value24.0 s

1/100

10%

neobird.de

316 ms

www.neobird.de

1373 ms

layerslider.css

107 ms

thegem-preloader.css

213 ms

thegem-reset.css

304 ms

Our browser made a total of 169 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 99% of them (167 requests) were addressed to the original Neobird.de, 1% (1 request) were made to Google.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Neobird.de.

Content Size

23.0 MB

After Optimization

2.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Neobird.de main page is 23.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 19.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 195.9 kB

Original 230.7 kB
After minification 218.9 kB
After compression 34.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 195.9 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 18.0 MB

Original 19.8 MB
After minification 1.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Neo Bird needs image optimization as it can save up to 18.0 MB or 91% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 618.5 kB

Original 1.1 MB
After minification 1.0 MB
After compression 433.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 618.5 kB or 59% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 1.6 MB

Original 1.8 MB
After minification 1.7 MB
After compression 216.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Neobird.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.6 MB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Now

157

After Optimization

The browser has sent 157 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Neo Bird. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 54 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.