Access neovapo.com. Neovapo | Cigarette electronique et e-liquide français

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

48/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

70/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.0 s

81/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value40 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.4 s

83/100

10%

www.neovapo.com

498 ms

css

27 ms

f01dd88ee402f0f6105514edf5feea0e_all.css

251 ms

0d480e03e43739b92ff3ddc8e760a95a.js

481 ms

micro-one-smok.png

92 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Neovapo.com, 6% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (858 ms) belongs to the original domain Neovapo.com.

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Neovapo.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 953.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 42.9 kB

Original 52.6 kB
After minification 44.3 kB
After compression 9.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.3 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.9 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

Original 953.0 kB
After minification 951.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Neovapo images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 280.0 kB

Original 413.3 kB
After minification 413.3 kB
After compression 133.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 280.0 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 207.7 kB

Original 252.2 kB
After minification 250.4 kB
After compression 44.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Neovapo.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 207.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Neovapo. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.