Access netader.com. الرئيسية

Report Summary

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

14/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.9 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.9 s

10/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value23,160 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value34.1 s

0/100

10%

netader.com

307 ms

index.html

93 ms

onecard.com

408 ms

237 ms

gtm.js

97 ms

Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Netader.com, 55% (47 requests) were made to Onecard.com and 33% (28 requests) were made to Downloads.netader.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Downloads.netader.com.

Content Size

977.1 kB

After Optimization

865.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Netader.com main page is 977.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 858.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 97.7 kB

Original 117.6 kB
After minification 117.1 kB
After compression 19.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 97.7 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 14.0 kB

Original 858.9 kB
After minification 844.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Netader images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 239 B

Original 667 B
After minification 667 B
After compression 428 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 239 B or 36% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Netader. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

Search Engine Optimization Advices

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

AR
Language Claimed

SA
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Netader.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Arabic is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Sanskrit language. Our system also found out that Netader.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Netader. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: