Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 59

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

nexotrans.com

Nexotrans- Plataforma online de Información del Transporte de mercancías por carretera

Page Load Speed

23.1 sec in total

First Response

285 ms

Resources Loaded

22 sec

Page Rendered

819 ms

About Website

Visit nexotrans.com now to see the best up-to-date Nexotrans content for Spain and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about nexotrans.com

Descripcion: Diario online del Transporte por carreteras. Noticias e información diaria de transporte. Periódico online de Transporte por Carretera

Visit nexotrans.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Nexotrans.com page load time and found that the first response time was 285 ms and then it took 22.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 3 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

nexotrans.com performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.5 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,620 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.125

83/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.6 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

nexotrans.com

285 ms

www.nexotrans.com

530 ms

politica-de-cookies.js

472 ms

jquery-1.9.1.min.js

491 ms

jquery-migrate-1.2.1.js

51 ms

Our browser made a total of 144 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (85 requests) were addressed to the original Nexotrans.com, 23% (33 requests) were made to Publicidad.nexotur.com and 4% (6 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.8 sec) relates to the external source Nexotur.cibeles.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 252.9 kB (10%)

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

2.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Nexotrans.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 88.2 kB

  • Original 105.2 kB
  • After minification 87.5 kB
  • After compression 17.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 17.7 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 88.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 57.0 kB

  • Original 2.0 MB
  • After minification 2.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Nexotrans images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 58.4 kB

  • Original 304.4 kB
  • After minification 303.5 kB
  • After compression 246.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 58.4 kB or 19% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 49.3 kB

  • Original 179.7 kB
  • After minification 177.7 kB
  • After compression 130.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nexotrans.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 49.3 kB or 27% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 63 (47%)

Requests Now

134

After Optimization

71

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 134 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nexotrans. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

nexotrans.com accessibility score

59

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

nexotrans.com best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

nexotrans.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ES

  • Language Claimed

    ES

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nexotrans.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Nexotrans.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Nexotrans. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: