Access niva.city. Web Hosting, Domain Registration , Server Hosting

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

40/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

34/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.5 s

72/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,680 ms

11/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.013

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.2 s

5/100

10%

nivacity.com

60 ms

main.css

23 ms

all.min.css

18 ms

style.css

26 ms

bootstrap-flat-extras.css

41 ms

Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Niva.city, 18% (17 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (629 ms) relates to the external source Nivacity.com.

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Niva.city main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 916.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 122.1 kB

Original 153.0 kB
After minification 147.5 kB
After compression 30.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 122.1 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 4 B

Original 916.7 kB
After minification 916.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Niva images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.3 kB

Original 166.4 kB
After minification 166.4 kB
After compression 164.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 3.7 kB

Original 185.6 kB
After minification 185.6 kB
After compression 182.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Niva.city has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Niva. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 36 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.