Access nonameworld.com. No Name World | Luxury Fashion Clothing for Men and Women

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

11/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

30/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.1 s

14/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,560 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.04

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.4 s

7/100

10%

www.nonameworld.com

457 ms

css

36 ms

sbi-styles.min.css

103 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

188 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

266 ms

Our browser made a total of 140 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (108 requests) were addressed to the original Nonameworld.com, 10% (14 requests) were made to C0.wp.com and 4% (5 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (682 ms) belongs to the original domain Nonameworld.com.

Content Size

579.1 kB

After Optimization

385.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Nonameworld.com main page is 579.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 272.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 150.3 kB

Original 180.9 kB
After minification 175.3 kB
After compression 30.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 150.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 10.8 kB

Original 272.0 kB
After minification 261.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. No Name World images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 32.4 kB

Original 126.2 kB
After minification 126.2 kB
After compression 93.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.4 kB or 26% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

Original 5 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.

Requests Now

132

After Optimization

The browser has sent 132 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of No Name World. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 60 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 63 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.