Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

nutracheck.com

Top rated calorie counter website and app | Nutracheck

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

167 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

780 ms

About Website

Welcome to nutracheck.com homepage info - get ready to check Nutracheck best content right away, or after learning these important things about nutracheck.com

Try FREE for 7 days. Track what you eat with our calorie counter and food diary - just 10 minutes a day.

Visit nutracheck.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Nutracheck.com page load time and found that the first response time was 167 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

nutracheck.com performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

11/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.0 s

63/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value270 ms

82/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.922

3/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.1 s

20/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

nutracheck.com

167 ms

nutracheck.com

292 ms

Home

125 ms

bootstrap.min.css

20 ms

jquery-1.12.4.min.js

20 ms

Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 23% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Nutracheck.com, 72% (44 requests) were made to D2lhwe7okuon6r.cloudfront.net and 2% (1 request) were made to Widget.trustpilot.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (988 ms) relates to the external source D2lhwe7okuon6r.cloudfront.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 960.5 kB (17%)

Content Size

5.8 MB

After Optimization

4.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Nutracheck.com main page is 5.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 36.6 kB

  • Original 46.6 kB
  • After minification 38.5 kB
  • After compression 10.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.1 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.6 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 664.6 kB

  • Original 5.4 MB
  • After minification 4.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Nutracheck needs image optimization as it can save up to 664.6 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 96.7 kB

  • Original 149.9 kB
  • After minification 145.2 kB
  • After compression 53.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 96.7 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 162.6 kB

  • Original 196.0 kB
  • After minification 180.4 kB
  • After compression 33.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nutracheck.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 162.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (15%)

Requests Now

55

After Optimization

47

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nutracheck. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

nutracheck.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

nutracheck.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

nutracheck.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nutracheck.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Nutracheck.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Nutracheck. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: