Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 82

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    87% of other websites

  • 67

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 32% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

ob-ultrasound.net

Obstetric Ultrasound History Web

Page Load Speed

4.1 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

220 ms

About Website

Visit ob-ultrasound.net now to see the best up-to-date Ob Ultrasound content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ob-ultrasound.net

History of the development of Ultrasound scanning in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Visit ob-ultrasound.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Ob-ultrasound.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ob-ultrasound.net performance score

82

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

42/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

71/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.2 s

61/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.2 s

94/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ob-ultrasound.net

1086 ms

ob-ultrasound.net

1136 ms

dussik_apparatus.jpg

127 ms

adr_2130bw.jpg

372 ms

3D_fetus.jpg

487 ms

Our browser made a total of 6 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Ob-ultrasound.net and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Ob-ultrasound.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 9.9 kB (4%)

Content Size

233.9 kB

After Optimization

224.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Ob-ultrasound.net main page is 233.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 223.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 7.9 kB

  • Original 10.6 kB
  • After minification 10.5 kB
  • After compression 2.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.9 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.0 kB

  • Original 223.3 kB
  • After minification 221.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ob Ultrasound images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

4

After Optimization

4

  • Images

The browser has sent 4 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ob Ultrasound. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

ob-ultrasound.net accessibility score

67

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

ob-ultrasound.net best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

SEO Factors

ob-ultrasound.net SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1252

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ob-ultrasound.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ob-ultrasound.net main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ob Ultrasound. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: