Access oel.org. Ontario Electrical League - The Ontario Electrical League, ON

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.6 s

52/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value180 ms

92/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.3 s

40/100

10%

www.oel.org

152 ms

cms-public-styles

68 ms

cms-public-header-scripts

173 ms

css

37 ms

captivatestyles.css

124 ms

Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 21% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Oel.org, 45% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 12% (4 requests) were made to Chambermaster.blob.core.windows.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (222 ms) relates to the external source Chambermaster.blob.core.windows.net.

Content Size

346.1 kB

After Optimization

240.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Oel.org main page is 346.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 268.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 11.8 kB

Original 15.7 kB
After minification 12.8 kB
After compression 3.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.9 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.8 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 59.4 kB

Original 268.5 kB
After minification 209.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Oel needs image optimization as it can save up to 59.4 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 32.9 kB

Original 57.1 kB
After minification 57.1 kB
After compression 24.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.9 kB or 58% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-37%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

Original 4.8 kB
After minification 4.8 kB
After compression 3.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Oel.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.8 kB or 37% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Oel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.