Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 8

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    22% of other websites

  • 66

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

omotion.net

Awesome tools and plug-ins for Final Cut Pro X - omotion

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

48 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

171 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Omotion content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about omotion.net

Browse our useful plugins for Final Cut Pro X that will deliver smooth and simple video editing workflow. Titles, transitions, animation tools, slideshows.

Visit omotion.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Omotion.net page load time and found that the first response time was 48 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

omotion.net performance score

8

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

51/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.1 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,290 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.868

4/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.0 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

omotion.net

48 ms

aijg.css

4 ms

aijg.css

17 ms

aijc.css

31 ms

aijc.css

48 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 24% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Omotion.net, 53% (29 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 11% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (548 ms) relates to the external source Chimpstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 91.3 kB (11%)

Content Size

846.1 kB

After Optimization

754.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Omotion.net main page is 846.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 539.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 89.3 kB

  • Original 110.6 kB
  • After minification 110.5 kB
  • After compression 21.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 89.3 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 4.8 kB
  • After minification 4.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Omotion images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 539.0 kB
  • After minification 538.6 kB
  • After compression 537.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 753 B

  • Original 191.7 kB
  • After minification 191.7 kB
  • After compression 190.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Omotion.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (70%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

7

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Omotion. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

omotion.net accessibility score

66

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

omotion.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

omotion.net SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Omotion.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Omotion.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: