Access onimaginative.com. Digital Marketing Services in Kolkata

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.7 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.0 s

9/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value810 ms

36/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.018

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.9 s

16/100

10%

onimaginative.com

1079 ms

www.onimaginative.com

3514 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

2305 ms

post-1578.css

1895 ms

main.min.css

1912 ms

Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Onimaginative.com, 15% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4 sec) belongs to the original domain Onimaginative.com.

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

892.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Onimaginative.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 986.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 156.6 kB

Original 186.5 kB
After minification 177.8 kB
After compression 29.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 156.6 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 74.8 kB

Original 621.4 kB
After minification 546.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, On Imaginative needs image optimization as it can save up to 74.8 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 407.2 kB

Original 597.2 kB
After minification 597.2 kB
After compression 189.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 407.2 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 861.1 kB

Original 986.6 kB
After minification 982.2 kB
After compression 125.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Onimaginative.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 861.1 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of On Imaginative. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.