Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

optimalaccess.com

Best Content Curation Tool | Modern Bookmark Manager, curate

Page Load Speed

4.5 sec in total

First Response

628 ms

Resources Loaded

3.5 sec

Page Rendered

451 ms

About Website

Welcome to optimalaccess.com homepage info - get ready to check Optimalaccess best content for Iran right away, or after learning these important things about optimalaccess.com

Best Content Curation Tool: Streamline Your Content Curation Efforts with Kurator: Organize, Access and Publish curated content with ease.

Visit optimalaccess.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Optimalaccess.com page load time and found that the first response time was 628 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

optimalaccess.com performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.0 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.6 s

11/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,420 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.006

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value24.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

optimalaccess.com

628 ms

style.min.css

78 ms

bb-plugin__css__jquery-bxslider-css-v99ae27b547d8e1a4fea2c447142def32897b8e77.css

97 ms

bb-oa-modules__modules__testimonial__css__testimonials-css-v17dd78a3fa6de1f18c38ada8fde62a740a5759bf.css

109 ms

content__uploads__bb-plugin__cache__7756-layout-css-v49a0de0d9bf800cf70865b3c66a227cd2f05853b.css

106 ms

Our browser made a total of 151 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (123 requests) were addressed to the original Optimalaccess.com, 3% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (789 ms) belongs to the original domain Optimalaccess.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 302.7 kB (12%)

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

2.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Optimalaccess.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 158.0 kB

  • Original 200.2 kB
  • After minification 195.0 kB
  • After compression 42.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 158.0 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 138.9 kB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Optimalaccess images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.7 kB

  • Original 566.5 kB
  • After minification 566.5 kB
  • After compression 562.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

  • Original 181.3 kB
  • After minification 181.3 kB
  • After compression 179.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Optimalaccess.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 103 (74%)

Requests Now

139

After Optimization

36

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 139 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Optimalaccess. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 77 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 28 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

optimalaccess.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

optimalaccess.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

optimalaccess.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Optimalaccess.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Optimalaccess.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Optimalaccess. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: