Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 28

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    47% of other websites

  • 41

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 19% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

otomol.com

Otomol - İkinci El Araç Dünyası | Satılık 2. El Oto

Page Load Speed

9.5 sec in total

First Response

1.3 sec

Resources Loaded

7.5 sec

Page Rendered

673 ms

About Website

Visit otomol.com now to see the best up-to-date Otomol content for Turkey and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about otomol.com

Otomol, kullanılmış 2.el otomobil satışı ve BMW, MINI, Mercedes-Benz Volvo, Audi, Volkswagen Yetkili servisidir. Satılık yüzlerce ikinci el araç ilanı burada.

Visit otomol.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Otomol.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 8.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

otomol.com performance score

28

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value15.3 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value35.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value23.9 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value540 ms

55/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.144

77/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value31.9 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.otomol.com

1266 ms

js

51 ms

js

107 ms

js

150 ms

conversion.js

93 ms

Our browser made a total of 153 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (124 requests) were addressed to the original Otomol.com, 8% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (5 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Otomol.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (21%)

Content Size

6.8 MB

After Optimization

5.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Otomol.com main page is 6.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 6.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 151.9 kB

  • Original 187.7 kB
  • After minification 115.0 kB
  • After compression 35.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 72.7 kB, which is 39% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 151.9 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 1.2 MB

  • Original 6.1 MB
  • After minification 4.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Otomol needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 56.7 kB

  • Original 332.1 kB
  • After minification 332.0 kB
  • After compression 275.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 56.7 kB or 17% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 56.8 kB

  • Original 203.2 kB
  • After minification 203.2 kB
  • After compression 146.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Otomol.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 56.8 kB or 28% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (33%)

Requests Now

138

After Optimization

93

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 138 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Otomol. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

otomol.com accessibility score

41

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

otomol.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

otomol.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    TR

  • Language Claimed

    TR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Otomol.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Turkish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Otomol.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Otomol. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: