Access our-concept.com. Our Concept|Web Design,Development,web hosting,software development

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

78/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

48/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.2 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.2 s

95/100

10%

our-concept.com

169 ms

99 ms

styles.css

64 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.3.1.css

90 ms

blue-green.css

83 ms

Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Our-concept.com, 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Star-clicks.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (333 ms) relates to the external source Star-clicks.com.

Content Size

269.6 kB

After Optimization

242.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Our-concept.com main page is 269.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 187.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 11.9 kB

Original 15.5 kB
After minification 12.7 kB
After compression 3.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.8 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.9 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 3.2 kB

Original 187.9 kB
After minification 184.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Our Concept images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 9.4 kB

Original 59.4 kB
After minification 59.4 kB
After compression 50.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 9.4 kB or 16% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 2.6 kB

Original 6.7 kB
After minification 6.7 kB
After compression 4.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Our-concept.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.6 kB or 39% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Our Concept. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.