Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

packappeal.com

Print Finishing Excellence | New Jersey | Perfect Finishing

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

122 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

55 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Packappeal content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about packappeal.com

Perfect Finishing is a leading print finshing company, specializing in foil stamping, UV finishes, bindery, die cutting & folding and gluing. Known for excellence in packaging for the cosmetic, pharma...

Visit packappeal.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Packappeal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 122 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

packappeal.com performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

16/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

14/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.7 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value440 ms

64/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.3 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.perfectfinishinginc.com

122 ms

minified.js

37 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

37 ms

polyfill.min.js

1346 ms

mobile-app-invite-banner.css

66 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Packappeal.com, 29% (17 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 20% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Polyfill-fastly.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 867.6 kB (48%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

957.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Packappeal.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 817.8 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB
  • After compression 208.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 817.8 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 423.0 kB
  • After minification 421.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Packappeal images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 48.4 kB

  • Original 374.7 kB
  • After minification 374.7 kB
  • After compression 326.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 48.4 kB or 13% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 56 B

  • Original 1.4 kB
  • After minification 1.4 kB
  • After compression 1.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Packappeal.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (33%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

26

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Packappeal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

packappeal.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

packappeal.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

packappeal.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Packappeal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Packappeal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Packappeal. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: