Report Summary

  • 71

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

paywithcover.com

Velocity Black - the ultimate membership for an extraordinary life

Page Load Speed

980 ms in total

First Response

51 ms

Resources Loaded

828 ms

Page Rendered

101 ms

About Website

Welcome to paywithcover.com homepage info - get ready to check Paywithcover best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about paywithcover.com

We help high performance people unlock the vast potential of their lives in the digital age. Welcome to concierge, reimagined.

Visit paywithcover.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Paywithcover.com page load time and found that the first response time was 51 ms and then it took 929 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

paywithcover.com performance score

71

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

50/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

65/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.3 s

75/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value340 ms

74/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.01

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.1 s

52/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

paywithcover.com

51 ms

velocity.black

647 ms

vb-staging-sandbox-n.fd48b380f.min.css

55 ms

jquery-3.5.1.min.dc5e7f18c8.js

20 ms

vb-staging-sandbox-n.daf99f138.js

93 ms

Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Paywithcover.com, 70% (14 requests) were made to Cdn.prod.website-files.com and 15% (3 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (647 ms) relates to the external source Velocity.black.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 36.9 kB (45%)

Content Size

82.0 kB

After Optimization

45.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Paywithcover.com main page is 82.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 51.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 36.9 kB

  • Original 51.1 kB
  • After minification 50.5 kB
  • After compression 14.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.9 kB or 72% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 30.9 kB
  • After minification 30.9 kB
  • After compression 30.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

4

After Optimization

4

The browser has sent 4 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Paywithcover. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

paywithcover.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

paywithcover.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

paywithcover.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Paywithcover.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Paywithcover.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Paywithcover. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: