Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

pazinga.com

MassMall

Page Load Speed

6.8 sec in total

First Response

355 ms

Resources Loaded

6.2 sec

Page Rendered

217 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Pazinga content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about pazinga.com

MassMall.Com is an online mall (cyber-mall) whose purpose is to connect sellers with buyers. Sellers can list, promote, and sell products online. Buyers use our site to view, analyze, and purchase pro...

Visit pazinga.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Pazinga.com page load time and found that the first response time was 355 ms and then it took 6.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pazinga.com performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

25/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.0 s

46/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value590 ms

50/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.11

87/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.2 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

massmall.com

355 ms

js

62 ms

addtohomescreen.css

125 ms

bootstrap.css

180 ms

font-awesome.min.css

123 ms

Our browser made a total of 393 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Pazinga.com, 2% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 1% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (754 ms) relates to the external source Massmall.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.9 MB (5%)

Content Size

52.8 MB

After Optimization

49.9 MB

In fact, the total size of Pazinga.com main page is 52.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 52.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 270.1 kB

  • Original 308.9 kB
  • After minification 269.2 kB
  • After compression 38.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 39.7 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 270.1 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 2.6 MB

  • Original 52.3 MB
  • After minification 49.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pazinga images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 17.3 kB

  • Original 109.4 kB
  • After minification 109.4 kB
  • After compression 92.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 17.3 kB or 16% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 13.2 kB

  • Original 51.2 kB
  • After minification 51.2 kB
  • After compression 37.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pazinga.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.2 kB or 26% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (6%)

Requests Now

385

After Optimization

361

The browser has sent 385 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pazinga. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

pazinga.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

pazinga.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

pazinga.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pazinga.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Pazinga.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Pazinga. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: