Access pereda.com. Eugenio Pereda Saneamientos

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

49/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value21.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.9 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,250 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.256

48/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.3 s

2/100

10%

pereda.com

353 ms

pereda.com

1054 ms

theme.css

650 ms

ps_socialfollow.css

355 ms

cookiesplus.css

575 ms

Our browser made a total of 128 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (126 requests) were addressed to the original Pereda.com, 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Iqit-commerce.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Pereda.com.

Content Size

10.6 MB

After Optimization

7.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Pereda.com main page is 10.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 8.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 391.6 kB

Original 434.1 kB
After minification 298.0 kB
After compression 42.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 136.1 kB, which is 31% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 391.6 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 1.2 MB

Original 8.4 MB
After minification 7.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Pereda needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 796.3 kB

Original 1.1 MB
After minification 1.1 MB
After compression 300.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 796.3 kB or 73% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 525.3 kB

Original 627.0 kB
After minification 562.0 kB
After compression 101.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pereda.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 525.3 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Now

122

After Optimization

The browser has sent 122 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pereda. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.