Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 57

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    73% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

perigord.com

Dordogne Périgord : Visites, Hébergements, Loisirs, Tourisme...

Page Load Speed

24.6 sec in total

First Response

11.1 sec

Resources Loaded

13 sec

Page Rendered

526 ms

About Website

Welcome to perigord.com homepage info - get ready to check Perigord best content for Belgium right away, or after learning these important things about perigord.com

Préparez votre séjour en Dordogne Perigord : Toutes les informations utiles sur le plus beau département du sud Ouest à découvrir...

Visit perigord.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Perigord.com page load time and found that the first response time was 11.1 sec and then it took 13.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

perigord.com performance score

57

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

16/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.7 s

7/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.0 s

32/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.2 s

50/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.perigord.com

11081 ms

jquery.min.js

194 ms

core.min.js

288 ms

datepicker.min.js

307 ms

button.min.js

371 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Perigord.com, 9% (3 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (11.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Perigord.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 360.3 kB (43%)

Content Size

847.6 kB

After Optimization

487.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Perigord.com main page is 847.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 442.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 354.2 kB

  • Original 442.0 kB
  • After minification 437.9 kB
  • After compression 87.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 354.2 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 6.1 kB

  • Original 405.6 kB
  • After minification 399.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Perigord images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (45%)

Requests Now

31

After Optimization

17

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Perigord. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

perigord.com accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

perigord.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

perigord.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FR

  • Language Claimed

    FR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Perigord.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Perigord.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Perigord. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: