408 ms in total
12 ms
333 ms
63 ms
Click here to check amazing Perimeter Watch content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about perimeterwatch.com
PerimeterWatch empowers today’s businesses with the latest in network security intelligence and infrastructure.
Visit perimeterwatch.comWe analyzed Perimeterwatch.com page load time and found that the first response time was 12 ms and then it took 396 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.
perimeterwatch.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
41/100
10%
Value0
0/100
25%
Value3.3 s
91/100
10%
Value110 ms
97/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value5.0 s
76/100
10%
12 ms
39 ms
55 ms
23 ms
60 ms
Our browser made a total of 10 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Perimeterwatch.com, 10% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 10% (1 request) were made to Netlify-rum.netlify.app. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (143 ms) belongs to the original domain Perimeterwatch.com.
Page size can be reduced by 64.3 kB (84%)
76.8 kB
12.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Perimeterwatch.com main page is 76.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 76.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 64.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.8 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 64.3 kB or 84% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
4
4
The browser has sent 4 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Perimeter Watch. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
{{url}}
{{time}} ms
perimeterwatch.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
perimeterwatch.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
perimeterwatch.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Perimeterwatch.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Perimeterwatch.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
{{og_description}}
perimeterwatch.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Perimeter Watch. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: