Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 96

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

picomol.de

picomol › Freie Software, offene Standards und Sonstiges

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

352 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

613 ms

About Website

Visit picomol.de now to see the best up-to-date Picomol content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about picomol.de

Picomol ist ein Blog über freie Software, freie Standards und allem sonst, was ich noch interessant finde.

Visit picomol.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Picomol.de page load time and found that the first response time was 352 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

picomol.de performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

67/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

55/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.7 s

69/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,790 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.007

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.3 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

picomol.de

352 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

111 ms

style.css

213 ms

widget.css

212 ms

twentyfourteen.css

217 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Picomol.de, 7% (3 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (633 ms) belongs to the original domain Picomol.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 685.6 kB (67%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

345.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Picomol.de main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 458.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 36.8 kB

  • Original 49.6 kB
  • After minification 49.6 kB
  • After compression 12.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.8 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 7.4 kB

  • Original 84.8 kB
  • After minification 77.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Picomol images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 287.3 kB

  • Original 458.0 kB
  • After minification 457.8 kB
  • After compression 170.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 287.3 kB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 354.2 kB

  • Original 438.4 kB
  • After minification 413.2 kB
  • After compression 84.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Picomol.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 354.2 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (66%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Picomol. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

picomol.de accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

picomol.de best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

picomol.de SEO score

96

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Picomol.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Picomol.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Picomol. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: