Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 68

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

pigging.tools

Devices and equipment for inspections, pigging and repairs of oil, gas and water pipelines | PIGGING.TOOLS

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

70 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

203 ms

About Website

Visit pigging.tools now to see the best up-to-date PIGGING content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about pigging.tools

PIGGING.TOOLS: devices and equipment for inspections, pigging and repairs of oil, gas and water pipelines from 89 to 1420 mm

Visit pigging.tools

Key Findings

We analyzed Pigging.tools page load time and found that the first response time was 70 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pigging.tools performance score

68

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

93/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

84/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.9 s

95/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,030 ms

26/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.0 s

53/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pigging.tools

70 ms

tag.js

985 ms

analytics.js

22 ms

js

54 ms

main.css

51 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Pigging.tools, 13% (4 requests) were made to Counter.yadro.ru and 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (985 ms) relates to the external source Mc.yandex.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 34.4 kB (9%)

Content Size

394.3 kB

After Optimization

359.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Pigging.tools main page is 394.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 196.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 14.2 kB

  • Original 18.3 kB
  • After minification 15.6 kB
  • After compression 4.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.7 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.2 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 354 B

  • Original 196.2 kB
  • After minification 195.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. PIGGING images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 11.8 kB

  • Original 158.9 kB
  • After minification 158.9 kB
  • After compression 147.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 8.1 kB

  • Original 20.8 kB
  • After minification 20.8 kB
  • After compression 12.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pigging.tools needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 8.1 kB or 39% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (30%)

Requests Now

27

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of PIGGING. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

pigging.tools accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

pigging.tools best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

pigging.tools SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pigging.tools can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Pigging.tools main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of PIGGING. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: