Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 13

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

pil.lighting

Indoor and Outdoor Lighting | Performance iN Lighting United States of America / Canada

Page Load Speed

5.1 sec in total

First Response

377 ms

Resources Loaded

3.9 sec

Page Rendered

776 ms

About Website

Visit pil.lighting now to see the best up-to-date Pil content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about pil.lighting

Light is our raw material and our inspiration source: for 40 years we have been developing projects in the field of indoor and outdoor lighting | Performance iN Lighting United States of America / Can...

Visit pil.lighting

Key Findings

We analyzed Pil.lighting page load time and found that the first response time was 377 ms and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pil.lighting performance score

13

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

28/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.4 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,850 ms

9/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.256

48/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value39.6 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

377 ms

font-awesome.css

205 ms

css2

37 ms

Layout_0_2410090829492949.css

693 ms

restyle-us.css

659 ms

Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Pil.lighting, 10% (9 requests) were made to Pil-cdn.thron.com and 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) relates to the external source Performanceinlighting.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (11%)

Content Size

13.7 MB

After Optimization

12.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Pil.lighting main page is 13.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 13.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 94.8 kB

  • Original 111.1 kB
  • After minification 100.3 kB
  • After compression 16.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 94.8 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 1.2 MB

  • Original 13.2 MB
  • After minification 12.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pil images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-43%

Potential reduce by 124.5 kB

  • Original 290.7 kB
  • After minification 290.7 kB
  • After compression 166.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 124.5 kB or 43% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-44%

Potential reduce by 54.3 kB

  • Original 122.8 kB
  • After minification 122.8 kB
  • After compression 68.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pil.lighting needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 54.3 kB or 44% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (38%)

Requests Now

73

After Optimization

45

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pil. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

pil.lighting accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

pil.lighting best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

pil.lighting SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Document doesn't have a valid hreflang

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pil.lighting can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Pil.lighting main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Pil. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: