Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

pipemarker.com

Pipe Markers - ANSI / ASME Pipe Labeling. Fast Shipping.

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

115 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

266 ms

About Website

Visit pipemarker.com now to see the best up-to-date Pipe Marker content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about pipemarker.com

Buy Pipe Markers, Valve Tags, Nameplates, and other Pipe ID products direct from USA manufacturer. Fast shipping.

Visit pipemarker.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Pipemarker.com page load time and found that the first response time was 115 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pipemarker.com performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.2 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.5 s

27/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value340 ms

74/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.0 s

27/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pipemarker.com

115 ms

pipemarker.com

142 ms

www.pipemarker.com

462 ms

baseline.0007e694f0d90af2aedd5ed9481cd1b9.css

35 ms

960.0007e694f0d90af2aedd5ed9481cd1b9.css

71 ms

Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Pipemarker.com, 16% (15 requests) were made to Google.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Pipemarker.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 73.1 kB (6%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Pipemarker.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 735.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 41.0 kB

  • Original 51.9 kB
  • After minification 44.5 kB
  • After compression 10.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.4 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.0 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.0 kB

  • Original 503.0 kB
  • After minification 502.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pipe Marker images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 27.4 kB

  • Original 735.5 kB
  • After minification 735.5 kB
  • After compression 708.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 21.7 kB
  • After minification 21.7 kB
  • After compression 18.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pipemarker.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.6 kB or 17% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (52%)

Requests Now

90

After Optimization

43

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 90 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pipe Marker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

pipemarker.com accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

pipemarker.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

pipemarker.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pipemarker.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Pipemarker.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pipe Marker. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: