Access pisomap.com. Inmobiliaria en Antequera Pisomap

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.3 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.2 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value880 ms

32/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.086

93/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.9 s

2/100

10%

www.pisomap.es

237 ms

pisomap.es

2822 ms

cleantalk-public.min.css

344 ms

styles.css

343 ms

menu-image.css

345 ms

Our browser made a total of 191 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Pisomap.com, 2% (4 requests) were made to Cdn.trustindex.io and 2% (4 requests) were made to Lh3.googleusercontent.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) relates to the external source Pisomap.es.

Content Size

6.8 MB

After Optimization

2.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Pisomap.com main page is 6.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 337.7 kB

Original 378.3 kB
After minification 326.8 kB
After compression 40.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 51.5 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 337.7 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 74.4 kB

Original 1.8 MB
After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pisomap images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 1.9 MB

Original 2.6 MB
After minification 2.5 MB
After compression 721.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.9 MB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 1.8 MB

Original 2.0 MB
After minification 1.8 MB
After compression 281.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pisomap.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.8 MB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Now

180

After Optimization

The browser has sent 180 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pisomap. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 64 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 44 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.