Access pixelight.fr. Ecran géant LED vente et location de mur video LED, affichage LED

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

37/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.0 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value760 ms

39/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.035

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.3 s

4/100

10%

pixelight.fr

344 ms

www.pixelight.fr

1389 ms

page.css

127 ms

commons.css

258 ms

highslide-html.css

368 ms

Our browser made a total of 141 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (118 requests) were addressed to the original Pixelight.fr, 9% (13 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to and 3% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Pixelight.fr.

Content Size

6.6 MB

After Optimization

6.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Pixelight.fr main page is 6.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 6.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 76.1 kB

Original 91.9 kB
After minification 91.3 kB
After compression 15.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 76.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 389.5 kB

Original 6.1 MB
After minification 5.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. PIXELIGHT images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 62.2 kB

Original 403.0 kB
After minification 403.0 kB
After compression 340.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 62.2 kB or 15% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-43%

Potential reduce by 10.7 kB

Original 25.2 kB
After minification 25.2 kB
After compression 14.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pixelight.fr needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.7 kB or 43% of the original size.

Requests Now

134

After Optimization

The browser has sent 134 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of PIXELIGHT. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

FR
Language Claimed

FR
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pixelight.fr can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pixelight.fr main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of PIXELIGHT. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: