Report Summary

  • 64

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

plasticblisterpack.com

Blister Packaging ,Plastic Face Shield,Plastic Box,Plastic Insert Tray Manufacturer and Supplier in China

Page Load Speed

4.4 sec in total

First Response

423 ms

Resources Loaded

3.5 sec

Page Rendered

511 ms

About Website

Visit plasticblisterpack.com now to see the best up-to-date Plastic Blister Pack content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about plasticblisterpack.com

We are manufacturer of Blister Packaging in China, if you want to buy Plastic Face Shield, Plastic Box, Plastic Insert Tray, please contact us. We sincerely hope to establish business relationships an...

Visit plasticblisterpack.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Plasticblisterpack.com page load time and found that the first response time was 423 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

plasticblisterpack.com performance score

64

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

33/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

61/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.9 s

65/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value450 ms

63/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.9 s

54/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

plasticblisterpack.com

423 ms

www.plasticblisterpack.com

741 ms

swiper-4.5.3.min.css

293 ms

base.css

292 ms

theme_color_28.css

826 ms

Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Plasticblisterpack.com, 46% (31 requests) were made to Bsg-s.nbxc.com and 25% (17 requests) were made to Bsg-i.nbxc.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Bsg-i.nbxc.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 145.6 kB (5%)

Content Size

2.7 MB

After Optimization

2.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Plasticblisterpack.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 76.7 kB

  • Original 91.9 kB
  • After minification 75.0 kB
  • After compression 15.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.9 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 76.7 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 41.7 kB

  • Original 2.3 MB
  • After minification 2.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Plastic Blister Pack images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 24.6 kB

  • Original 278.9 kB
  • After minification 278.9 kB
  • After compression 254.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 2.5 kB

  • Original 17.8 kB
  • After minification 17.6 kB
  • After compression 15.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Plasticblisterpack.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.5 kB or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (62%)

Requests Now

65

After Optimization

25

The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Plastic Blister Pack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

plasticblisterpack.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

plasticblisterpack.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

plasticblisterpack.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Plasticblisterpack.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Plasticblisterpack.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Plastic Blister Pack. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: