Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

pluto.life

Pluto Classic Demo Request

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

268 ms

Resources Loaded

831 ms

Page Rendered

93 ms

About Website

Visit pluto.life now to see the best up-to-date Pluto content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about pluto.life

You need a supported web browser to use: Google Drive Docs Sheets Sites Slides Forms Learn what a browser is, which

Visit pluto.life

Key Findings

We analyzed Pluto.life page load time and found that the first response time was 268 ms and then it took 924 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pluto.life performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

19/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.2 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.0 s

46/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,230 ms

20/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.2 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

viewform

268 ms

6283888

348 ms

analytics.js

109 ms

js

182 ms

fKYxJWmqWKS5JTWJUHJSE6u4tKZ6JbFx7YGMbbH0cI72r3E2MhU0vPrE6uaflUm94Q=w64

55 ms

Our browser made a total of 8 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Pluto.life, 13% (1 request) were made to Docs.google.com and 13% (1 request) were made to Support.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (348 ms) relates to the external source Support.google.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 887.2 kB (64%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

499.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Pluto.life main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 887.0 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB
  • After compression 368.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 887.0 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 2.2 kB
  • After minification 2.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pluto images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 169 B

  • Original 128.8 kB
  • After minification 128.8 kB
  • After compression 128.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (60%)

Requests Now

5

After Optimization

2

The browser has sent 5 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pluto. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

pluto.life accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

pluto.life best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

pluto.life SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pluto.life can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pluto.life main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pluto. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: