Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 71

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

polygfx.com

Best Sign Company Nampa, ID | Custom Signs, Graphics, & Wraps

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

138 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

770 ms

About Website

Visit polygfx.com now to see the best up-to-date Polygfx content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about polygfx.com

Attract more customers & build your brand with high-quality, affordable custom business signs that perform! Full-Service local Nampa sign company near me providing design-installation.

Visit polygfx.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Polygfx.com page load time and found that the first response time was 138 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

polygfx.com performance score

71

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

81/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

15/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.1 s

93/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value80 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.118

85/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.4 s

72/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

polygfx.com

138 ms

338 ms

jquery.min.js

32 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

51 ms

modernizr.custom.js

22 ms

Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Polygfx.com, 52% (44 requests) were made to Cdn.markmywordsmedia.com and 24% (20 requests) were made to Boisesigncompany.b-cdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (338 ms) relates to the external source Boisesigncompany.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 414.8 kB (17%)

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Polygfx.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 347.7 kB

  • Original 408.8 kB
  • After minification 408.7 kB
  • After compression 61.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 347.7 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 67.0 kB

  • Original 2.1 MB
  • After minification 2.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Polygfx images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (18%)

Requests Now

79

After Optimization

65

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Polygfx. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

polygfx.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

polygfx.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

polygfx.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Polygfx.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Polygfx.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Polygfx. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: