Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 72

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    82% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 78% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

portingkit.com

Porting Kit | Install Windows apps in Mac

Page Load Speed

713 ms in total

First Response

61 ms

Resources Loaded

569 ms

Page Rendered

83 ms

About Website

Visit portingkit.com now to see the best up-to-date Porting Kit content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about portingkit.com

With Porting Kit, you can install Windows games and apps on macOS easily using Wineskin technology!

Visit portingkit.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Portingkit.com page load time and found that the first response time was 61 ms and then it took 652 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

portingkit.com performance score

72

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

47/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.8 s

84/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value250 ms

84/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.015

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.1 s

86/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

portingkit.com

61 ms

portingkit.com

102 ms

www.portingkit.com

111 ms

bootstrap.min.css

48 ms

dashboard.css

62 ms

Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Portingkit.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (111 ms) belongs to the original domain Portingkit.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 35.3 kB (18%)

Content Size

200.2 kB

After Optimization

164.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Portingkit.com main page is 200.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 120.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 7.5 kB

  • Original 10.0 kB
  • After minification 8.6 kB
  • After compression 2.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.4 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.5 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 897 B

  • Original 17.7 kB
  • After minification 16.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Porting Kit images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 14.2 kB

  • Original 120.9 kB
  • After minification 120.9 kB
  • After compression 106.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 14.2 kB or 12% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 12.7 kB

  • Original 51.5 kB
  • After minification 51.5 kB
  • After compression 38.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Portingkit.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.7 kB or 25% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (53%)

Requests Now

15

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Porting Kit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

portingkit.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

portingkit.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

portingkit.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Portingkit.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Portingkit.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Porting Kit. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: