Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

position.digital

SEO Agency For Ambitious & Growing Brands

Page Load Speed

9.7 sec in total

First Response

2.5 sec

Resources Loaded

5.6 sec

Page Rendered

1.6 sec

About Website

Click here to check amazing Position content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about position.digital

We're an SEO agency for ambitious & growing brands. SEO, content, linking building, & digital PR with heart & grit. Come say hello!

Visit position.digital

Key Findings

We analyzed Position.digital page load time and found that the first response time was 2.5 sec and then it took 7.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

position.digital performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.1 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,720 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.041

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.6 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.position.digital

2490 ms

style.min.css

153 ms

css

35 ms

style.min.css

308 ms

ae-pro.min.css

228 ms

Our browser made a total of 106 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (88 requests) were addressed to the original Position.digital, 8% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Position.digital.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 5.6 MB (68%)

Content Size

8.2 MB

After Optimization

2.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Position.digital main page is 8.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 7.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 269.6 kB

  • Original 314.1 kB
  • After minification 304.7 kB
  • After compression 44.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 269.6 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 5.3 MB

  • Original 7.2 MB
  • After minification 2.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Position needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.3 MB or 73% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 27.9 kB

  • Original 446.3 kB
  • After minification 446.3 kB
  • After compression 418.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 50.0 kB

  • Original 224.0 kB
  • After minification 224.0 kB
  • After compression 173.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Position.digital needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 50.0 kB or 22% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 63 (68%)

Requests Now

93

After Optimization

30

The browser has sent 93 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Position. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 33 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

position.digital accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

position.digital best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

position.digital SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Position.digital can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Position.digital main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Position. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: