9.7 sec in total
2.5 sec
5.6 sec
1.6 sec
Click here to check amazing Position content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about position.digital
We're an SEO agency for ambitious & growing brands. SEO, content, linking building, & digital PR with heart & grit. Come say hello!
Visit position.digitalWe analyzed Position.digital page load time and found that the first response time was 2.5 sec and then it took 7.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
position.digital performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.5 s
15/100
10%
Value9.4 s
0/100
25%
Value16.1 s
0/100
10%
Value3,720 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.041
99/100
15%
Value19.6 s
2/100
10%
2490 ms
153 ms
35 ms
308 ms
228 ms
Our browser made a total of 106 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (88 requests) were addressed to the original Position.digital, 8% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Position.digital.
Page size can be reduced by 5.6 MB (68%)
8.2 MB
2.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Position.digital main page is 8.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 7.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 269.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 269.6 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.3 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Position needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.3 MB or 73% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 27.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 50.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Position.digital needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 50.0 kB or 22% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 63 (68%)
93
30
The browser has sent 93 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Position. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 33 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
{{url}}
{{time}} ms
position.digital accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
position.digital best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
position.digital SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Position.digital can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Position.digital main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
{{og_description}}
position.digital
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Position. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: