Report Summary

  • 72

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    82% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 96

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

practicalmonitoring.com

Practical Monitoring: Effective Strategies For the Real World

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

193 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

554 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Practical Monitoring content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about practicalmonitoring.com

Got a nagging feeling your monitoring needs improvement, but you just aren’t sure where to start or how to do it? Practical Monitoring is the book for you.

Visit practicalmonitoring.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Practicalmonitoring.com page load time and found that the first response time was 193 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

practicalmonitoring.com performance score

72

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

25/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

53/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.0 s

81/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.175

69/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.0 s

76/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

practicalmonitoring.com

193 ms

www.practicalmonitoring.com

337 ms

bootstrap4.min.css

166 ms

themify-icons.css

172 ms

style.css

327 ms

Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Practicalmonitoring.com, 23% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (2 requests) were made to Upbeat-artisan-4339.ck.page. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (396 ms) belongs to the original domain Practicalmonitoring.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 164.5 kB (30%)

Content Size

540.4 kB

After Optimization

376.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Practicalmonitoring.com main page is 540.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 461.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 65.6 kB

  • Original 79.2 kB
  • After minification 76.5 kB
  • After compression 13.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 98.9 kB

  • Original 461.2 kB
  • After minification 362.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Practical Monitoring needs image optimization as it can save up to 98.9 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (59%)

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

7

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Practical Monitoring. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

practicalmonitoring.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

practicalmonitoring.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

practicalmonitoring.com SEO score

96

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Practicalmonitoring.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Practicalmonitoring.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Practical Monitoring. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: