4.7 sec in total
764 ms
2.7 sec
1.3 sec
Visit princetonmarketing.net now to see the best up-to-date Princetonmarketing content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about princetonmarketing.net
Visit princetonmarketing.netWe analyzed Princetonmarketing.net page load time and found that the first response time was 764 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
princetonmarketing.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
18/100
10%
Value5.2 s
23/100
25%
Value6.0 s
46/100
10%
Value180 ms
91/100
30%
Value0.106
88/100
15%
Value11.4 s
19/100
10%
764 ms
123 ms
180 ms
185 ms
183 ms
Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Princetonmarketing.net, 8% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (966 ms) relates to the external source Purewellnessbody.com.
Page size can be reduced by 3.8 MB (22%)
17.7 MB
13.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Princetonmarketing.net main page is 17.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 17.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 123.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 123.2 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.6 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Princetonmarketing needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.6 MB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 31.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 31.4 kB or 22% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 73.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Princetonmarketing.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 73.0 kB or 37% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (50%)
82
41
The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Princetonmarketing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 28 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
{{url}}
{{time}} ms
princetonmarketing.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
princetonmarketing.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
princetonmarketing.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Princetonmarketing.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Princetonmarketing.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
{{og_description}}
princetonmarketing.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Princetonmarketing. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: