Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

privacyguard.com

My Credit Report & Credit Scores - All 3 Bureaus | PrivacyGuard

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

200 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

139 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Privacy Guard content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about privacyguard.com

My Credit Report & Credit Scores - All 3 Bureaus | PrivacyGuard | all three credit bureaus monitoring or a combination of identity and credit monitoring

Visit privacyguard.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Privacyguard.com page load time and found that the first response time was 200 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Privacyguard.com rating and web reputation

Performance Metrics

privacyguard.com performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

71/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.7 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.2 s

77/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value860 ms

33/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.8 s

56/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.privacyguard.com

200 ms

Style.aspx

23 ms

Style.aspx

41 ms

Style.aspx

209 ms

Style.aspx

120 ms

Our browser made a total of 96 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 34% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Privacyguard.com, 7% (7 requests) were made to D.adroll.com and 6% (6 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (764 ms) relates to the external source Cs.gssprt.jp.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 339.8 kB (37%)

Content Size

909.2 kB

After Optimization

569.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Privacyguard.com main page is 909.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 503.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 27.9 kB

  • Original 36.0 kB
  • After minification 31.3 kB
  • After compression 8.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.7 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.9 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 13.5 kB

  • Original 369.5 kB
  • After minification 356.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Privacy Guard images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 298.3 kB

  • Original 503.7 kB
  • After minification 502.2 kB
  • After compression 205.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 298.3 kB or 59% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 58 (74%)

Requests Now

78

After Optimization

20

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Privacy Guard. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

privacyguard.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

privacyguard.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

privacyguard.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Privacyguard.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Privacyguard.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Privacy Guard. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: