Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 58

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 38

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 19% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

privateline.app

2nd Phone Number App for Unlimited Text & Call | Private Line

Page Load Speed

192 ms in total

First Response

36 ms

Resources Loaded

105 ms

Page Rendered

51 ms

About Website

Visit privateline.app now to see the best up-to-date Private Line content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about privateline.app

Enjoy unlimited texting and calling and protect your online privacy with a 2nd number from Private Line. It is perfect for business, work, dating, online selling & shopping, etc.. Keep the numbers as ...

Visit privateline.app

Key Findings

We analyzed Privateline.app page load time and found that the first response time was 36 ms and then it took 156 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

privateline.app performance score

58

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.2 s

99/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.0 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.4 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value110 ms

97/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.586

11/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.3 s

73/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

privateline.app

36 ms

privateline.app

30 ms

caf.js

29 ms

main.42f5e61c.js

40 ms

main.1b609023.css

28 ms

Our browser made a total of 5 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 40% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Privateline.app, 40% (2 requests) were made to Img1.wsimg.com and 20% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (40 ms) relates to the external source Img1.wsimg.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 467.2 kB (67%)

Content Size

699.3 kB

After Optimization

232.0 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Privateline.app main page is 699.3 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 698.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-38%

Potential reduce by 197 B

  • Original 522 B
  • After minification 522 B
  • After compression 325 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 197 B or 38% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 467.0 kB

  • Original 698.0 kB
  • After minification 698.0 kB
  • After compression 231.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 467.0 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 52 B

  • Original 768 B
  • After minification 768 B
  • After compression 716 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Privateline.app has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

3

After Optimization

3

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 3 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Private Line. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

privateline.app accessibility score

38

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

privateline.app best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

privateline.app SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Privateline.app can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Privateline.app main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Private Line. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: