Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 64

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

profade.com

Profade | Otro sitio realizado con WordPress

Page Load Speed

32.4 sec in total

First Response

9.1 sec

Resources Loaded

23.1 sec

Page Rendered

158 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Profade content for Spain. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about profade.com

Visit profade.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Profade.com page load time and found that the first response time was 9.1 sec and then it took 23.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

profade.com performance score

64

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

63/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.4 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.7 s

51/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.044

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.7 s

68/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

profade.com

9139 ms

style.min.css

31 ms

style.min.css

51 ms

styles.css

57 ms

view.min.js

51 ms

Our browser made a total of 11 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Profade.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (9.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Profade.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 66.6 kB (64%)

Content Size

104.3 kB

After Optimization

37.7 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Profade.com main page is 104.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 80.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 66.4 kB

  • Original 80.1 kB
  • After minification 78.7 kB
  • After compression 13.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 48 B

  • Original 20.8 kB
  • After minification 20.8 kB
  • After compression 20.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 159 B

  • Original 3.4 kB
  • After minification 3.4 kB
  • After compression 3.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Profade.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (30%)

Requests Now

10

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 10 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Profade. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

profade.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

profade.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

profade.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Profade.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Profade.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Profade. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: