Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 66

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

profilepress.net

Modern WordPress Membership Plugin - ProfilePress

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

44 ms

Resources Loaded

384 ms

Page Rendered

824 ms

About Website

Visit profilepress.net now to see the best up-to-date Profile Press content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about profilepress.net

Monetize your site with our WordPress membership plugin, sell subscriptions & digital downloads, set up paid registration & restrict content.

Visit profilepress.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Profilepress.net page load time and found that the first response time was 44 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

profilepress.net performance score

66

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

59/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

55/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.8 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value430 ms

65/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.217

57/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.5 s

82/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

profilepress.net

44 ms

profilepress.net

41 ms

profilepress.com

86 ms

jquery.min.js

15 ms

mailoptin.min.js

63 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Profilepress.net, 93% (41 requests) were made to Profilepress.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Stats.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (120 ms) relates to the external source Profilepress.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 245.3 kB (37%)

Content Size

656.1 kB

After Optimization

410.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Profilepress.net main page is 656.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 359.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 245.2 kB

  • Original 294.0 kB
  • After minification 294.0 kB
  • After compression 48.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 245.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 359.4 kB
  • After minification 359.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Profile Press images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 21 B

  • Original 2.7 kB
  • After minification 2.7 kB
  • After compression 2.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (8%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

36

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Profile Press. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

profilepress.net accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

profilepress.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

profilepress.net SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Profilepress.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Profilepress.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Profile Press. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: