Access profound.digital. Experience Design & Digital Transformation Agency in Hampshire Profound Digital

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

20/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.0 s

9/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,620 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.197

63/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.8 s

10/100

10%

profound.digital

204 ms

www.profound.digital

459 ms

otSDKStub.js

74 ms

style.min.css

21 ms

app.css

46 ms

Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (84 requests) were addressed to the original Profound.digital, 1% (1 request) were made to Cookie-cdn.cookiepro.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Js-eu1.hs-scripts.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Profound.digital.

Content Size

5.9 MB

After Optimization

4.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Profound.digital main page is 5.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 5.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 100.5 kB

Original 117.0 kB
After minification 99.1 kB
After compression 16.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 17.9 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 100.5 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 1.3 MB

Original 5.6 MB
After minification 4.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Profound needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 24% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 7.7 kB

Original 112.7 kB
After minification 112.6 kB
After compression 105.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 18.8 kB

Original 31.6 kB
After minification 13.0 kB
After compression 12.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Profound.digital needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.8 kB or 59% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Profound. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.