Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

projectieschermen.com

Projectiescherm kopen? | Gratis geleverd! | TheNextShop

Page Load Speed

6.3 sec in total

First Response

313 ms

Resources Loaded

5.3 sec

Page Rendered

640 ms

About Website

Visit projectieschermen.com now to see the best up-to-date Projectiescherm En content for Netherlands and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about projectieschermen.com

Op zoek naar een projectiescherm? Bekijk ons uitgebreide assortiment of laat je adviseren in de showroom! Vergelijk en maak je keuze.

Visit projectieschermen.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Projectieschermen.com page load time and found that the first response time was 313 ms and then it took 5.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

projectieschermen.com performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

38/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

68/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.3 s

29/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,610 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.08

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.0 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

projectieschermen.com

313 ms

projectieschermen.com

402 ms

projectieschermen

1151 ms

fbevents.js

18 ms

z-bundle.1.3.min.css

155 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Projectieschermen.com, 35% (18 requests) were made to Logic4cdn.azureedge.net and 20% (10 requests) were made to Cdn.logic4.nl. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.3 sec) relates to the external source Content17.logic4server.nl.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 315.9 kB (39%)

Content Size

812.3 kB

After Optimization

496.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Projectieschermen.com main page is 812.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 301.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 249.1 kB

  • Original 301.9 kB
  • After minification 294.1 kB
  • After compression 52.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 249.1 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 3.4 kB

  • Original 90.6 kB
  • After minification 87.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Projectiescherm En images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 26.5 kB

  • Original 163.1 kB
  • After minification 163.1 kB
  • After compression 136.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 26.5 kB or 16% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 37.0 kB

  • Original 256.7 kB
  • After minification 256.6 kB
  • After compression 219.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Projectieschermen.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 37.0 kB or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (39%)

Requests Now

31

After Optimization

19

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Projectiescherm En. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

projectieschermen.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

projectieschermen.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

projectieschermen.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NL

  • Language Claimed

    NL

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Projectieschermen.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Projectieschermen.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Projectiescherm En. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: