Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

protable.com

Digital Measuring Devices | Accurate Technology Inc.

Page Load Speed

4.9 sec in total

First Response

724 ms

Resources Loaded

3.8 sec

Page Rendered

372 ms

About Website

Welcome to protable.com homepage info - get ready to check Protable best content right away, or after learning these important things about protable.com

Accurate Technology offers a variety of cutting edge digital measuring devices. Founded in 1989, we are the industry leader in meeting your measurement needs.

Visit protable.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Protable.com page load time and found that the first response time was 724 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

protable.com performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

40/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.4 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,700 ms

11/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.206

60/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.6 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.proscale.com

724 ms

ebb7c4b4d8ca85d8804748e6f616d86e.min.css

145 ms

styles-l.min.css

202 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

33 ms

293 ms

Our browser made a total of 196 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Protable.com, 3% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (3 requests) were made to T.visitorqueue.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (724 ms) relates to the external source Proscale.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 240.5 kB (18%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Protable.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 667.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 124.3 kB

  • Original 144.7 kB
  • After minification 126.7 kB
  • After compression 20.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 18.0 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 124.3 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 48.6 kB

  • Original 667.0 kB
  • After minification 618.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Protable images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 65.3 kB

  • Original 403.1 kB
  • After minification 402.8 kB
  • After compression 337.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 65.3 kB or 16% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 2.2 kB

  • Original 95.7 kB
  • After minification 95.7 kB
  • After compression 93.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Protable.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 155 (85%)

Requests Now

183

After Optimization

28

The browser has sent 183 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Protable. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 151 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

protable.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

protable.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

protable.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Protable.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Protable.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Protable. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: