Access protectowire.ru. Термокабель Protectowire

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value14.6 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value23.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.6 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value350 ms

73/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.6 s

4/100

10%

protectowire.ru

536 ms

protectowire.ru

1490 ms

notice.min.css

378 ms

default_5a3bab8c841f776da75530359c7c01b5_v1.css

379 ms

template_4317d203fac82d14628d46a9a38333c7_v1.css

1131 ms

Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Protectowire.ru, 7% (2 requests) were made to Bitrix.info and 4% (1 request) were made to . The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Protectowire.ru.

Content Size

2.7 MB

After Optimization

710.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Protectowire.ru main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 436.4 kB

Original 526.5 kB
After minification 436.0 kB
After compression 90.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 90.5 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 436.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 20.4 kB

Original 127.0 kB
After minification 106.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Protectowire needs image optimization as it can save up to 20.4 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 831.7 kB

Original 1.2 MB
After minification 1.2 MB
After compression 390.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 831.7 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 701.2 kB

Original 824.3 kB
After minification 799.4 kB
After compression 123.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Protectowire.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 701.2 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Protectowire. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.