Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 59

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

proxypirate.ml

proxypirate.ml

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

585 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

90 ms

About Website

Visit proxypirate.ml now to see the best up-to-date Proxypirate content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about proxypirate.ml

Visit proxypirate.ml

Key Findings

We analyzed Proxypirate.ml page load time and found that the first response time was 585 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

proxypirate.ml performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

proxypirate.ml

585 ms

ifdnzact.com

392 ms

cmp.php

402 ms

cmp_en.min.js

226 ms

px.js

17 ms

Our browser made a total of 11 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 9% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Proxypirate.ml, 45% (5 requests) were made to I1.cdn-image.com and 27% (3 requests) were made to Ifdnzact.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (585 ms) belongs to the original domain Proxypirate.ml.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 8.0 kB (6%)

Content Size

126.8 kB

After Optimization

118.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Proxypirate.ml main page is 126.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 106.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-57%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 2.2 kB
  • After minification 2.2 kB
  • After compression 941 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.3 kB or 57% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 18.3 kB
  • After minification 18.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Proxypirate images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 6.7 kB

  • Original 106.3 kB
  • After minification 106.3 kB
  • After compression 99.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (50%)

Requests Now

8

After Optimization

4

The browser has sent 8 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Proxypirate. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

proxypirate.ml accessibility score

59

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

proxypirate.ml best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

proxypirate.ml SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Proxypirate.ml can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Proxypirate.ml main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Proxypirate. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: